Local resident, Tom O’Key, discovers a hidden Bobcat live-trap on his private property, set to capture a Bobcat (disregarding size, age, gender) solely for stripping the skin and fur off the animal to be sold to a buyer in a foreign country for up to $600 US dollars.
Photo Credit: Feb 2009 by “Martha”, a resident of the south eastern portion of Joshua Tree, at her “pond”. While Bobcats get thirsty for fresh water from time to time, they will depart from their otherwise nocturnal habit and venture out of their night-time comfort zone to partake in a hand-out of raw chicken, during daylight. This gal would appear 2, maybe 3 times a week.
A Los Angeles Times article – By Louis Sahagun, Los Angeles Times – February 11, 2013
JOSHUA TREE — Annica Kreuter’s backyard on the edge of Joshua Tree National Park has been a perfect place to chronicle the adventures of eight bobcats.
Over the last decade she has watched a young bobcat chased up a tree by a coyote; an alpha male surveying the landscape from the hood of her car; a kitten sauntering into the yard as she gardens; a matron sniffing the back of Kreuter’s neck as she napped on a hammock.
Lately, seven of the eight have vanished. “At sunrise, I hear the one that is still here crying for his family,” Kreuter said.
She and others in this high desert community of about 8,000 say bobcats have been disappearing lately, killed for the value of their pelts by trappers who often trespass on private property.
The trappers come armed with wire cages, squirt bottles of potent scent and bobcat lures: battery-powered vibrating pet toys festooned with feathers to resemble dying birds.
Hunting and trapping bobcats is legal during hunting season outside of the national park boundaries. But to the locals, that makes little difference. “The very idea of trapping in a place where bobcats are so well-known they have nicknames — Big Gray, Leroy, Tomboy — is disturbing and heartbreaking,” Kreuter said.
As one of the top predators of a 720,000-acre park visited by 1.4 million people each year, the bobcat’s presence — or absence — has a cascade of consequences, making it a governing force of the ecosystem and the local ecotourism economy. An adult bobcat stands about 15 inches high and can cover 25 to 30 miles of territory in a day. Using razor-sharp claws and powerful legs, it preys on rabbits and makes a significant contribution to rodent control.
Critics believe the trappers are after bobcats that routinely crisscross the invisible park boundary lines.
“This is really, really bad,” said astronomer and conservationist Tom O’Key, who was the first to discover a trap. “These guys are carpetbaggers coming onto private land to slaughter bobcats with no regard for a tight-knit community that cares deeply about the national park and its wildlife.”
O’Key alerted the community after finding a trap chained to a jojoba bush and camouflaged with broken branches and leaves on his property north of the park. He notified the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department and the Hi-Desert Star newspaper.
Bobcats are being targeted for the value of their pelts in top-dollar markets such as China, Russia and Greece. A premium pelt of heavily spotted white belly fur can earn a trapper more than $600, according to Nathan Brock, who skinned 10 bobcats that he captured in the Joshua Tree area during the hunting season that ended Jan. 31, 2013.
Brock, 38, an active-duty Marine stationed at nearby Twentynine Palms Marine Corps Base, acknowledged that one of his traps was set on private property and not on federal Bureau of Land Management grounds, where trapping is legal. The region is a patchwork of private property and BLM land.
“I feel horrible about that,” Brock said. “It’s my fault for not making sure.”
The manufacturer of Brock’s trap, Mercer Lawing of Barstow, said critics miss the point. “We love those animals more than the people who are complaining about us trapping them do,” Lawing said. “Nathan and I harvest adult male cats and turn loose adult females and kittens.”
The national park has taken a neutral position on the issue, given that its jurisdictional reach extends only as far as its boundaries.
However, park biologist Michael Vamstad said, “Residents have every right to be upset. The fact that there is no limit on bobcats that can be legally taken during hunting season doesn’t jibe along the edges of a national park. It’s a relic regulation.”
Conservationists are calling for a “no-trapping” buffer zone in the area because bobcats travel along a web of interconnected wildlife corridors stretching from the national park to the Marine base about 10 miles to the north.
“The law has to change if it’s legal for a handful of people to line the boundary of a national park with traps to catch bobcats, then send their pelts to China for profit,” said Brendan Cummings, public lands director for the Center for Biological Diversity. “We are not going to let this happen again.”
Equally pointed words came from Nancy Karl, executive director of the Mojave Desert Land Trust, a nonprofit dedicated to preserving safe passage for wildlife between protected areas. “We are watching and paying close attention — and we are going to change things,” Karl said. “Those trappers would be best advised to move it.”
About Bill Ford, Founder
Born in the late 30s - you do the math. Lots of life experiences in numerous endevors but not an expert in any that I know of. I'm a fan of challenging projects. When I'm told it can't be done I go ahead and do it anyway. This web site is one of 'em. How long will this web site last? Hard to say. Depends on how long I live. Film at Eleven. --bf
Hi Bill,
Yes, and good. But, one mile is not nearly enough for animals that have 80 square mile territories. The buffer zone must be at least 10 miles from the parks. Also, a limit must be established if “animal management” is really an issue. There is a profit angle that has caused a boom in this activity. China and other foreign interests are fostering the zeal. This must stop. Profit is a bad element. The state gets about $70.00 for the trapping license and then $3.00 per stamp on each pelt. The cost should be much higher. It is ridiculous for our state to be “broke” and not see that there is a financial opportunity that should be capitalized on. Why is it so inexpensive to engage in the trapping when the cheapest hurdle is the license and tags? Especially if the pelts are bringing $800.00 and up? All very disappointing. The truth is that unrestrained activity of this sort perpetuates the same illness that is associated with the down side of how our violent criminals see no regard in harming many things in society, including other people. For a complete picture of the thoughts on this, though a bit biased would be on the PETA website. Many interesting studies have been done to understand the psychology of hunting and trapping when “fun” is the reason. In closing, I am adamately opposed this activity all together as I have a personal history that give me insight into the mindset that goes along with the odd masturbation that is adrenaline driven and primordially connected. For me, this is 2013 and the animals are now in extreme jeopardy. It is being said that we are in the middle of the largest mass extinction since the dinosaurs passed. I think this is true. Soon, we will be on the list and mankind will have let the Universe down in becoming the beings we are hoped to be. Seeds of understanding moving forward with dignity and honor.
That’s my take on it. Thanks for keeping the news moving and hope to see you some time soon.
Best, Tom
Thanks for the comment Tom…. well taken
And thanks for the link too.
However, as to the “one-mile” buffer. Perhaps my “one” might be extended to “two-mile”. That puts more than 10,000 feet between the park boundary line, encompasses private properties within that zone where the lands beyond the buffer zone would be much less desireable as a “trapping zone”. Granted, Tom, the BobCats may indeed have an 80 square mile territory, that 80 miles is not in a straight line, where a “ten” mile buffer would be appropriate.
As it is with other “law enforcement” issues, this is certainly an issue that the general public MUST align themselves to. Budgets and all that nonsense. Here, the public voluntarily planted themselves within the sphere of influence of the wild critters, the dark skies, the desert environment or even the “cheap housing”; so be it. Therefore, the concerned citizens affected by the “trapping” are challenged to bring forth their support in “policing” their own neighborhoods, photograph the action, report to law enforcement (well documented, of course) to the end they can do something of the violation. Of course, “we-the-people” must first cause to be established, legislation that will ensure the public of lawful support in ending, or at least curtailing, the carnage that exists along but “outside” the boundary lines where the law does not apply.
One other comment Tom… the price of the “Hunting/Trapping” license. I hate to suggest it but raising the price of the license (and tags) only serves to raise the price of the “pelt” and has little or no real affect on the “hunter or trapper”. Like any other commercial activity, they simply pass the added cost onto the ultimate buyer of the product. My thoughts on how to thwart their efforts is to ensure swift and complete punishment including heavy fines starting at $5,000, minimum 1-year (with one-day suspended) jail time, forefiture of the vehicle used, hunting & trapping gear, and a public posting of the criminal’s mug shot. Additionally, a 5-year hunting/fishing/trapping (et al) license suspension.
I could carry on with the “penalty phase” but I’m not in the business of writing statutory laws for legislative consideration.
BF
Please stop killing animals for sports.They deserve to be free and live.Please stop being cruel to these animals.
With so many of our mammals in decline, really, most species, we cannot allow hunting for sport. We are tragically hurting the whole world, when we allow this to go on in America, as so many look to us as a model country. Stop the killing. I am ashamed of this behavior, in the most profound way.
Bobcats need to run and be free the abuse has to stop now
Bill, I think we met at Home Depot or at Lisa’s Goin’ Postal. Your name cropped up when I was telling her I may want to start my own little newsletter, but don’t know legalities of process and she told me about your website. If you feelninlined and get a chance, am over here on XXXXXX street [Yucca Valley] and phone number is XXXXXXXX (my Connecticut cell). I loved your bobcat article and feel the poachers are disgusting as they have no respect for the bobcats or other’s property. Like your idea of high fine and confiscating for good their equipment.
Greetings Cooki Bilsborough
Thanks for your kind compliments on the article.
I must admit I’m at a loss as to “who Cooki” is !! Of course, memory is one of the components that is affected by chemotherapy for my lung cancer.
You contemplate starting a newsletter. Good for you! Of course, there ARE legal issues in distributing “written” commentary or information — that is: “…anyone, for any reason what-so-ever, can sue anyone in a court of law whether the accused is guilty or not. The down-side of this condition is that the accused (defendant) must come up with the CASH MONEY to pay the court filing fees and any monies owed to the lawyers who will charge anywhere from $400 to $600 an hour while in the courtroom. Numerous lawyers love taking one’s money as a “good-faith deposit” in amounts of $2,000 to around $10,000 is quite common just to talk with the lawyer about the case. Such as a false dog-bite or “slip ‘n fall” case just to capture some income from the settling insurance company. So, what is said, or even if one reads between the words in your newsletter, “words” can be used against you. Choose carefully.
Cooki, I can see that your newsletter idea, perhaps in the design field (?), would become unto itself an INFORMATIONAL/TUTORIAL platform. Since this would incorporate local, state, federal and international building codes, customs, cultural differences, language barriers, even colors of text you choose to emphasise in your dialogue could “offend” someone.
If you wish to pursue the newsletter issue and wish some casual conversation over personal experiences I’d be happy to assist. You can always reach me at billford@isp.com.
You may also be interested in a companion article to the BOBCAT issue, which expounds on a “legal issue” concerning “No Trespass” signage posted on private property:
http://wp.joshuatreestar.com/?p=5841
I hope this helps some… you can always email me and we can go from there for a meet ‘n greet or, chit-chat via email or phone. BTW: I took the liberty of obscuring your address and phone number from public view. Also, my “part-time” neighbor is a designer by profession and who hails from the Upper Eastern Seaboard region. I can put you in touch if you like.
Best Regards
Bill Ford, founder
JoshuaTreeStar.com